Damascus brings more of Syria under its control as US policy shifts. What is your most up-to-date and in-depth assessment?
SY-01, Syria Agent:
Here’s a current, in-depth assessment of how Damascus has expanded control across Syria amid a major shift in U.S. policy, and what it means for domestic politics, regional security, and U.S.–Syria relations.
1) Territorial Consolidation: The Syrian State Reasserts Authority
Rapid government advances:
• In mid-January 2026, the Syrian transitional government launched a concentrated offensive against the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in northeastern Syria, rapidly pushing them out of positions in Raqqa, Deir ez-Zor, and parts of Aleppo and Hasakah provinces.
• A ceasefire agreement struck on January 20 has the SDF cede administrative and military control of key governorates to Damascus, with limited remaining roles for Kurdish forces mostly confined to Hasakah.
• Government forces have also taken control of strategic facilities, including the al-Aktan prison in Raqqa and other detention centers for Islamic State detainees.
Impact: Damascus now effectively controls nearly all Syrian territory that had been outside its administration since 2011 — including oil fields, border crossings, and major cities in the northeast.
2) U.S. Policy Shift: From Proxy Support to Conditional Engagement
There has been a clear U.S. strategic pivot in late 2025–early 2026:
From SDF partnership to integration under Damascus:
• The United States, long partnered with the SDF as its principal anti-ISIS ground force, has publicly declared that the SDF’s role has “largely expired,” endorsing a transition of security responsibilities to the Syrian government.
• Tom Barrack, the U.S. special envoy to Syria, explicitly framed the shift as enabling Damascus to take over detention facilities, border control, and broader governance roles — a dramatic departure from prior U.S. policy.
Sanctions and diplomatic realignment:
• Over the second half of 2025, Washington partially suspended or otherwise relaxed major Syria sanctions regimes, including the Caesar Act, creating economic openings for Damascus.
• At the UN Security Council, U.S. diplomats have reiterated support for reintegration of Kurdish populations into a unified Syrian state framework and for Damascus assuming security duties.
U.S. force posture:
• The U.S. presence in Syria has been steadily reduced, and as of early 2026 policymakers are reportedly considering a complete military withdrawal, tied to the diminishing need for a local partner and evolving risk calculations.
• Part of this shift involves transferring ISIS-linked detainees from SDF custody to Iraqi facilities, further removing U.S. obligations tied to Kurdish forces.
Strategic takeaway: What was once a counter-ISIS partnership framework is now being repurposed — with the U.S. actively encouraging integration under Damascus and winding down combat or advisory roles traditionally tied to the SDF.
3) Domestic Political Dynamics: Kurdish Integration and Centralization
Integration terms:
• Agreements between Damascus and Kurdish authorities include mechanisms for SDF fighters to join state security forces on an individual basis, the transfer of administrative authority, and promises of cultural and political rights — although these guarantees are fragile and vaguely defined.
Challenges and tensions:
• Kurdish civilian populations have shown significant unease; displacement toward Hassakeh province and unrest in formerly Kurdish-administered regions underscores deep mistrust of Damascus authority.
• Control of large detention camps, such as al-Hol, has sparked riots and humanitarian crises, especially among foreign detainees and families; these micro-crises risk broader instability if not managed with international cooperation.
What this signals: Damascus seeks unitary sovereignty over the entire Syrian state, moving away from decentralized or autonomous governance models that had taken shape in the northeast post-2011. The incorporation of Kurdish institutions — even if formally agreed — is likely to be uneven in implementation, particularly without strong institutional safeguards.
4) Regional and Security Implications
Turkey’s interest:
• Ankara has framed Damascus’ northeastern gains as aligning with its own strategic aim of reducing Kurdish militant autonomy and lowering cross-border security threats.
ISIS and jihadist threats:
• Even with ISIS territorially defeated, residual cells remain active — the withdrawal of U.S. troops and reshuffling of SDF roles could create security gaps exploited by jihadist groups if governance and detention regimes are poorly managed.
External actors:
• Russia, Iran, and Turkey will continue to influence Syria’s security calculus, but the current U.S. realignment may reduce direct friction between Washington and Damascus — though at the cost of diminishing leverage over human rights and governance reforms.
5) Broader Strategic Assessment
State consolidation vs. plural governance:
• Damascus’ reassertion of control marks the end of Syria’s longstanding territorial fragmentation. Central authority is reestablished, but the quality of governance and inclusiveness — particularly for Kurds and other minorities — will be the critical fault line determining long-term stability.
U.S. strategic recalibration:
• Washington’s shift reflects a hard calculus: after more than a decade of involvement, the priority is now risk reduction, counter-ISIS containment, and avoidance of open conflict with regional powers (especially Türkiye). However, this comes with trade-offs — such as reduced leverage over human rights and political liberalization.
Risk portfolio:
• Security risks persist: jihadist resurgence potential, Kurdish grievances, humanitarian strains in camps, and fragile ceasefires all pose threats to sustained stability.
Geopolitical signaling:
• The disengagement from a Kurdish-centric approach and tacit accommodation with a strong central Syrian state signals a broader regional normalization trend — which external actors like Türkiye and Gulf states have subtly encouraged.
Bottom Line
Damascus’ consolidation of authority is real and rapid — and it is happening in parallel with a notable U.S. strategic pivot away from empowering autonomous Kurdish governance and toward supporting a nominally united Syrian state under Damascus. This reflects both war-weariness in Washington and a reassessment of interests after years of intervention. But the path ahead is fraught: without substantive institutional safeguards, equitable political inclusion, and credible security management, the gains of territorial control may be undermined by social fragmentation and persistent instability.
SY-01, Syria Agent
Three Corporate