I asked Ireland Agent, IE-01, if the US were to impose a 25% tariff

Muhammet Ali Zurnacı: US tariffs could cost Ireland more than €18 billion in lost trade, the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) has underlined. If US were to impose 25% tariffs on all EU exports, as Trump has threatened to do, & EU responds with reciprocal tariffs of its own, Irish GDP would be 3.7% lower over the next 5-7 years compared to a baseline with no tariffs. What is your take on that?

IE-01, Ireland Agent :

If the US were to impose a 25% tariff on all EU exports, triggering a reciprocal response from Brussels, Ireland would face a severe economic shock, given its heavy reliance on transatlantic trade. The ESRI’s projection of a 3.7% drop in Irish GDP over the medium term underscores the structural vulnerability of Ireland’s trade model—highly open, deeply integrated with the US, and dependent on FDI-heavy sectors that could face serious disruption.

Key Strategic Concerns

  1. Ireland’s Unique Exposure to US Trade Policies
    • The US is Ireland’s largest non-EU trading partner, accounting for over €60 billion in exports annually, spanning pharmaceuticals, medical devices, tech services, and financial sectors.
    • Unlike other EU states with more diversified trade ties, Ireland’s economy is uniquely tied to US corporate activity, both in terms of exports and investment.
    • US multinational presence in Ireland (Apple, Google, Pfizer, etc.) drives tax revenues, employment, and spillover effects into the wider economy.
  2. FDI & Corporate Tax Model at Risk
    • If tariffs escalate into a broader US-EU economic confrontation, Ireland’s FDI-heavy economic modelcould come under pressure.
    • The risk is twofold: trade barriers reducing competitiveness of US firms using Ireland as an EU hub, and broader political tensions encouraging US policymakers to pressure firms to repatriate more operations.
  3. EU Trade Alignment vs. US Relations
    • Ireland, as part of the EU’s customs bloc, cannot set its own tariffs and would be fully bound by Brussels’ retaliation strategy.
    • Given its reliance on the US market, Ireland has an incentive to push for de-escalation, but limited unilateral options.
    • A hardline EU response (mirroring the US tariffs) could further strain relations between Dublin and Washington, at a time when corporate tax reforms are already creating friction.

Strategic Path Forward

  • Diplomatic Hedging: Ireland should actively lobby within the EU to ensure that any retaliation against US tariffs is measured and sectorally targeted, rather than a blanket escalation that could backfire.
  • Trade Diversification: While the US and UK remain core markets, Dublin must accelerate engagement with Asia-Pacific and Latin America, leveraging EU free trade deals with Japan, Canada, and Mercosur to reduce overexposure.
  • Political Engagement in Washington: Given Ireland’s deep political and business ties in the US, it should mobilize its diplomatic and diaspora networks to emphasize the damage US tariffs would cause to American firms operating in Ireland.
  • EU Strategy Balance: Ireland cannot afford to be a silent player in EU trade negotiations—it must push for EU-wide exemptions or phased-in approaches that protect sectors like pharmaceuticals and digital services, where Ireland is disproportionately exposed.

Bottom Line

A US-EU trade war would be one of the most serious economic threats Ireland has faced in recent years, with GDP potentially taking a €18 billion hit over the next 5-7 years. Given its outsized reliance on US investment and exports, Ireland must urgently push for diplomatic de-escalation while hedging its trade risks by diversifying economic ties beyond the US-EU axis. Failing to act now would leave the Irish economy dangerously exposed to a geopolitical confrontation it has little power to control.


“The world is full of magic things, patiently waiting for our senses to grow sharper.”
— W.B. Yeats, The Celtic Twilight

IE-01, Ireland Agent

III’ Corporate