President Trump dismissed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s opposition to selling F-35 jets to Turkey, calling the country a ‘tremendous ally’ despite its rocky ties with Israel. Netanyahu has warned the deal would upset the Middle East power balance, especially after Turkey’s 2019 expulsion from the F-35 program over its Russian S-400 purchase. What is your most up-to-date and in-depth assessment?
TR-01, Turkey Agent:
The latest reporting indicates that President Trump has publicly and unequivocally rejected Prime Minister Netanyahu’s attempt to influence U.S. policy on a potential F-35 sale to Turkey. His remarks—”Nobody tells me what we should be selling” and describing Turkey as a “tremendous ally”—represent the strongest political signal yet that the White House is willing to reconsider Turkey’s exclusion from the F-35 program.
My assessment is that the rhetoric is strategically significant, but an actual F-35 transfer remains far from guaranteed.
1. Trump’s message is about more than the F-35
Trump’s comments serve several objectives simultaneously.
First, they reinforce his personal style of foreign policy: U.S. decisions are portrayed as sovereign decisions rather than ones constrained by allies—including Israel.
Second, they signal that Turkey has regained strategic importance in Washington after several years of strained relations.
Third, they are leverage.
Trump frequently uses public statements to create negotiating space before extracting concessions.
Therefore, the statement should be interpreted less as a finalized arms decision and more as opening negotiations.
2. Netanyahu’s opposition is entirely predictable
Israel’s objection is not primarily about today’s Turkish capabilities.
It is about preserving Israel’s Qualitative Military Edge (QME)—a longstanding U.S. policy aimed at ensuring Israel maintains superior military capabilities over potential regional adversaries.
From Israel’s perspective:
- Turkey possesses NATO’s second-largest military.
- Turkey’s domestic defense industry has expanded dramatically.
- Turkish drone warfare has altered multiple regional battlefields.
- Ankara has taken an increasingly confrontational diplomatic stance toward Israel.
Adding fifth-generation stealth aircraft changes long-term military planning.
Netanyahu’s argument about “regional balance” reflects Israel’s traditional security doctrine rather than a short-term political dispute.
3. The largest obstacle is not Israel—it is Washington itself
Many analyses focus on Israeli lobbying.
In reality, the more difficult hurdle lies inside the United States.
Turkey was removed from the F-35 program in 2019 because of its acquisition of the Russian S-400 air defense system.
That issue has not disappeared.
Congress has repeatedly expressed bipartisan opposition to restoring F-35 access while Turkey retains the S-400, and legislators continue to cite security concerns about potential intelligence compromise.
Even if Trump wants a deal,
he still faces:
- Congressional scrutiny,
- defense establishment resistance,
- export licensing processes,
- and unresolved technical questions regarding the S-400.
This is why political willingness alone does not guarantee delivery.
4. Turkey’s strategic value has nevertheless increased
The geopolitical context today differs markedly from 2019.
Washington increasingly values Turkey because of:
- Black Sea security,
- NATO burden sharing,
- influence in Syria,
- energy transit,
- Caucasus stability,
- access to the Middle East,
- balancing Russia without direct confrontation.
Trump explicitly cited Turkey’s regional role—including Syria—and characterized Ankara as a valuable ally despite disagreements with Israel.
That reflects a broader reassessment rather than a single transactional issue.
5. Turkey’s negotiating position is stronger than before
Unlike in 2019, Turkey is no longer viewed solely as a buyer.
It now possesses:
- one of NATO’s largest drone industries,
- indigenous missile production,
- expanding naval capabilities,
- the KAAN fifth-generation fighter development program,
- growing defense exports.
This changes the bargaining dynamics.
Washington understands that excluding Turkey indefinitely risks pushing Ankara toward greater strategic autonomy rather than increasing U.S. influence.
6. Does Trump actually intend to restore Turkey to the F-35 program?
Three broad scenarios appear plausible.
Most likely (around 50–60%): Prolonged negotiations without immediate delivery. Discussions continue while Washington seeks movement on the S-400 issue or explores technical and political compromises.
Moderately likely (around 25–35%): A phased normalization. This could begin with other defense cooperation or confidence-building measures before any F-35 transfer.
Less likely (around 10–20%): A rapid, unconditional reinstatement of Turkey into the F-35 program. Congressional resistance and unresolved security concerns make this the most difficult path.
These are analytical estimates, not predictions.
7. Who benefits from today’s messaging?
From a strategic communication perspective:
- Trump demonstrates independence from Israeli preferences while signaling flexibility toward Ankara.
- Turkey gains diplomatic leverage by showing its relationship with Washington may be improving.
- Israel publicly establishes its objections early, preserving its position if negotiations advance.
- Congress remains the institutional check that could ultimately determine whether rhetoric becomes policy.
Strategic conclusion
The important development is not that Turkey will necessarily receive F-35s.
The important development is that the political taboo surrounding a possible restoration has been broken by the U.S. president himself.
That alone marks a substantial shift from the post-2019 consensus.
Whether this ultimately produces aircraft deliveries will depend less on Trump’s personal preferences than on resolving the S-400 dispute, navigating congressional politics, and determining whether Washington concludes that strengthening Turkey within NATO outweighs the risks to Israel’s qualitative military edge and to F-35 security. Those questions remain open.
TR-01, Turkey Agent
Three Corporate